Okay! a can of worms this one is right?
The U.S supreme court ruled a few days ago to (essentially) legalise same sex marriage, something gay/lesbian activists have been advocating (“fighting” if you will) for for decades.
I have thoughts, feelings and opinions on the issue, it’s my right to.
Many people may not like my thoughts feelings and opinions and that is ok, they don’t have to, but this IS my blog and so it’s my place to add my opinion to the internet discussion.
With that said, I’d ask that if anyone is actually inclined to investigate my opinions (and hey! it could happen), then before people condemn me for them (if they reflexively disagree on an emotional level), that they truly read and consider everything I’m trying to say here.
The first thing I want to say is that I believe all love is and should be treated equal. I respect any human's right to love whomever they choose, regardless of race, sex appearance or any other factor what-so-ever.
Everyone needs love, both to give and receive it.
With that said, I don’t think marriage is solely about recognising to people's love for one and other.
Marriage is NOT just a piece of “paper” and NOT just a concept supported by various religions and churches.
Marriage is very much a legal concept that is tied heavily in with socio-economics.
Marriage affords things like tax and financial benefits.
SO! with that in mind, I think one must broaden their view of social “equality” (for every human, including heterosexuals and females) before same-sex marriage and its repercussions can be fully understood.
I watched a video on youtube last night in which a gay man stated that “no-one looses as a result of this ruling” (I gather by “looses” he meant: suffers a disadvantage of some form in life).
I think only time will tell, but! my personal suspicion is that the female sex and anyone who is in a heterosexual union will (probably without realising it to begin with) suffer in the long term, from a socio-economic stand point.
Why?
Because females aren’t “equal” to males in a socio-economic sense and by many, also aren't considered "equal" on a societal level . most of us don’t (and can’t) do equal work, and most of us don’t get equal pay, and males cannot have babies, and therefore do not get or need the supposed concessions females are generally afforded (most of which are the REASONS females aren’t treated equally)
SO! a legal union with all the economic benefits marriage affords, with none of the financial and economic disadvantages that come with (at least one partner) being female, will afford a married all male couple a clear financial and economic advantage over any couple or legal union where (at least) one partner is female.
Thus, women "loose" overall, and gay marriage actually moves society closer towards inequality.
So some will say: “ok, just pay females equally, and give them equality”.
To do that in the manner most would need for it to be officially recognised, would mean trying to circumvent our biological reality as a species.
I own a business of my own. If I’m to employ someone to do a particular job, I have to pay them out of the money my business makes from the labour the employee provides me, combined with the resources and labour I provide by myself.
If I employ a female, the I have to budget from that same amount of income, to continue to pay her if she needs maternity leave to have a child, yet I’m NOT able to sell her labour in order to make that income, so I also need to pay someone else to provide that labour in her stead. I don’t have to consider that if I employ a male.
It is simply more expensive to employ females than it is males and there is NOT endless money in the world and I do not make endless profit (no business does, although some seem to go close).
Biological reality means that females simply cannot perform equal work to males, I wish it wasn’t the truth but it is, that’s NOT my fault, that is nature.
SO! to pay females (seemingly) equally to males means that males need to do (even) MORE of the hard work and earn LESS money for doing it
Here’s a newsflash! males (statistically speaking, most of whom are heterosexual) already do the most and the hardest of the work in the world.
I’m not talking about business men, or white collar workers here, I’m talking about men like my boyfriend. I’ talking about the blue collar workers, plumbers, mechanics, electricians, truck drivers, the hard PHYSICAL work (including the stuff that is most detrimental to a persons health)
Those guys already work the hardest, and they already are underpaid for what they do, If you make their socio-economic position worse by reducing the worth (socially) of what they earn from the hard work they do, then soon enough they’ll have nothing to loose in life. they’ll revolt, and they’ll take back the balance of power (socially) that they had/have, and they WON’T do it using a legal system that betrayed them, they’ll do it by force, because that is what nature gifted them.
And then nature and biology will show “society” exactly who IS in charge.
And that will NOT be a very “fun” time to be female or homosexual.
I’m all for equality, I think that until now, with the recognition same-sex marriage, we’ve been pretty close to as “equal” as we’re able to get.
That doesn’t mean we’re all treated “the same” in the world (but then we aren’t all the same are we? do you truly want to be the same as everyone else?).
And that comes from a woman who most people believe (or would argue) is actually just a gay man who went "to far". If I end up married, then the legal recognition of gay marriage can only help protect my marriage if people try to question it's legitimacy.
I STILL don't think the time was right for it.
And that comes from a woman who most people believe (or would argue) is actually just a gay man who went "to far". If I end up married, then the legal recognition of gay marriage can only help protect my marriage if people try to question it's legitimacy.
I STILL don't think the time was right for it.